Re: Agreement between IDSF and IPDSC reached - What a joke
22. marts 2008 16:00
Sorry that I have to point out what is obvious to me. Since you seem to keep harping on about how WDC is bad and IDSF is better since it seems to recognise true sporting values, I thought I would try to illustrate exactly how valuable this recognition is.
The IDSF/IPDSC hangs so much of its ( singular not plural) importance on the Olympic dream. Do you really see Chess or Bridge being included ever in a Sporting event? Dancesport ( I hate the word, so does Windows which treats it as a spelling mistake) has an equal chance in my very humble opinion. How can a Sport require the wearing of a tailsuit and long dress with sparkly decoration? The one main requirement of any Ballroom or Latin-American Dancer is elegance. Of course throughout a competition dancers require physical fitness , etc but it's no more sport than Swan Lake which has the same requirements. Adding an adjudication does not change it to a sport (e.g. Chelsea flower show)
Basically I really don't care what you call it but I do object to misguided individuals supporting any organisation that threatens the future of Competitors by banning/non-recognition of great events. Yes WDC was guilty of the same errors in the distant past( very distant) but their open market policy could not be more fair( it does include a non-doping policy too).
The IDSF shifted the goal posts first by deleting the word amateur from their rules but then created holy hell when the WDC adopted it. The WDC have never recognised any Amateur Organisation despite propaganda to the contrary.
My advice to all Amateur/ Professional competitors is to follow your hearts, dance in front of the people who preceeded you i.e. The Champions of the past not the taxi drivers/ politicians of the present.
The success of the various versions of Dancing with the Stars/ Strictly Come Dancing prove how our pastime/hobby/profession is viewed by the Public , it's entertainment. period.
Happy Easter
|